【春运进行时】一路上有你守护，真好！****** 春运，承载着异地游子对阖家团圆、平安祥和的期盼。作为疫情防控新阶段下首个春运，今年的返乡路注定与以往不同。据交通运输部消息，春运期间客流总量预计达20.95亿人次，比去年同期增长99.5%。
热闹起来的车站，人头攒动的大厅，有这样一群人围绕在旅客身边，默默守护他们的返乡路。
今年春运从1月7日开始 至2月15日结束 共40天（新华社记者 毛思倩 摄）
“您能听到吗？坚持住啊！”
1月7日10时13分，河南郑州火车站西广场，在众多旅客踏上归途时，一名年轻男子突然口吐白沫晕倒在地。见状，一旁的志愿者迅速开展急救。
“血压117/70，脉搏68……”急救中，医护人员扶着男子头部，按压人中穴，并清理口中白沫，另一名医护人员则测量他的各项体征，不停呼唤意识。3分钟后，男子渐渐清醒，120急救车也抵达现场。
对倒地旅客进行救治（来源：郑州广播电视台）
原来，现场参与急救的志愿者是郑州市中医院的医护人员，事发时他们正在附近为旅客宣传急救知识、免费测量血压。医护人员表示，患者倒地时出现了牙关紧闭、四肢抽搐的情况，初步判断为癫痫的急性发作，因此采用了检测呼吸、检测心跳等方式进行急救。幸运的是，男子最终恢复了意识。
“一边赶路一边处理事情，包丢了都没发现！”
1月7日，乘坐飞机从天津飞往广州的吴先生拿着自己在春运途中丢失的挎包，再三向乘务员表示感谢。“我一边赶路一边处理事情，包丢了都没发现，多亏了你们，追到候机楼给我送来！”
吴先生找回挎包（来源：北方网）
随着春节临近，民航运输业已进入客流高峰期。当天，天津航空GS7895抵达广州后，乘务员正在进行清舱工作，忽然发现一只遗失在座椅上的男士挎包和一个水杯。包内有1万多元现金、两部手机、若干证件等。
“为不耽误旅客行程，我们立刻奔向廊桥寻找失主。”乘务员小苏说，经过寻找，终于联系到失主吴先生，并将物品归还。直到拿到失物，吴先生都没反应过来，自己随身的挎包被遗忘在了飞机上。
当面清点现金和贵重物品后，吴先生激动地说：“如果这些丢了，可耽误大事了!”
“幸亏有你，要不然我都不知道该怎么补救！”
熙熙攘攘的人群中，几抹靓色格外显眼。在湖南祁阳火车站内，随处可见身着红色、绿色马甲的志愿者，他们中很多都是连续几年参与志愿活动的“老兵”。
唐荣就是其中之一，今年是她第三次参加春节志愿者服务。一早，她就和队友赶到高铁站，迎接第一波返乡旅客。
在拥挤的人群中，石女士有些慌乱,当听到到站广播后她急忙下车，可走到站台前才发现自己下错了站，此时的车门已缓缓关闭。
焦急无助的石女士进入了唐荣视野。唐荣了解情况后，带她第一时间向车站工作人员反映，核验乘车证明后，石女士被安排乘坐就近的一趟列车，继续前往目的地。
“幸亏有你，要不然我都不知道该怎么补救！”临上车时，石女士再三向唐荣表示感谢。
“做志愿者其实很累，但旅客的一句感谢，足以支撑我坚持下去。”在完成了本趟列车的志愿服务后，唐荣静静等候着下一趟进站的列车。
策划：李方舟
整理：董大正
资料：新华社、央广网、红网、北方网
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 一分钟彩票地图 |
